Delilah Tech

AI tools to make U.S. legislation easier to search, understand, and track for citizens and professionals.

Cover Block

From the public record

Field	Value
Name	Delilah Tech
Tagline	AI tools to make U.S. legislation easier to search, understand, and track for citizens and professionals. [FSU News, June 2026]
Headquarters	San Francisco Bay Area
Founded	2025
Stage	Pre-Seed
Business Model	B2B2C
Industry	Defense / Govtech
Technology	AI / Machine Learning
Geography	North America
Growth Profile	Venture Scale
Founding Team	Co-Founders (3+)
Funding Label	Seed
Total Disclosed Funding	$1,000,000 [Crunchbase, March 2026]

The Short Version

PUBLIC Delilah Tech is an early-stage civic tech company building AI tools to help users search, understand, and track U.S. legislation, a proposition that stands out because it is trying to serve both policy professionals and ordinary citizens through a professional intelligence product and a consumer mobile app at the same time [delilah.tech, Unknown] [delilah.tech, Unknown] [Justia Trademarks, August 2025]. The company traces back to founder and CEO Joseph Visconti’s experience in the Florida Capitol, which, according to Florida State University News, informed the view that legislative information remained difficult for the public to access and interpret [FSU News, June 2026]. Public product materials describe Delilah Pro as an AI legislative intelligence platform for government affairs teams and policy professionals, with bill search, side by side comparison, report generation, voting record analysis, and alerts across all 50 states, while trademark and App Store materials indicate a broader mobile product oriented to civic engagement and bill tracking for end users [delilah.tech, Unknown] [Justia Trademarks, August 2025] [Apple].

The team appears strongest on policy context and early commercial positioning rather than on a long public record of scaled software execution: Visconti is presented as a former Florida Gubernatorial Fellow, Matthew Koziol is identified as CTO, and Edward Lando is listed as Head of Sales and Growth and as a co-founder of Vector Fund [delilahusa.com] [FSU News, June 2026] [LinkedIn, retrieved 2026]. On financing, Crunchbase attributes a $1.0 For investors, the near-term question is less whether legislative information is hard to use, that premise is credible, and more whether Delilah can translate product breadth into repeatable distribution, especially if it is selling into professionals while also sustaining consumer engagement [FSU News, June 2026] [Christ School, March 2026]. Over the next 12 to 18 months, the signals that matter are straightforward: evidence of paying institutional users, proof that the 50-state tracking layer is reliable enough for professional workflows, and signs that the consumer experience creates either durable usage or a defensible acquisition channel for the higher-value professional product [delilah.tech, Unknown] [Christ School, March 2026] [Florida News Beep, April 2026].

Inferred, not confirmed -- This section relies on one public database entry for funding, one trademark filing, one App Store listing, and several company or affiliated sources for product and team claims.

Taxonomy Snapshot

Axis	Value
Stage	Pre-Seed
Business Model	B2B2C
Industry / Vertical	Defense / Govtech
Technology Type	AI / Machine Learning
Geography	North America
Growth Profile	Venture Scale
Founding Team	Co-Founders (3+)
Funding	Seed, approximately $1,000,000 disclosed [Crunchbase, March 2026]

The Company in Brief

PUBLIC

Delilah Tech appears to be a very young civic-technology company organized around a plain problem: legislative information is abundant, but for most users it is still hard to search, compare, and follow in one place. Public materials describe the company as building AI tools to make U.S. legislation easier to search, understand, and track, with a Bay Area headquarters and a 2025 founding date listed on Crunchbase [Crunchbase, March 2026]. The company’s own website presents Delilah as an AI legislative intelligence platform covering bills, legislators, and votes across all 50 states and Congress [delilah.tech].

The legal entity is partially visible in public-facing documents. Delilah’s terms state that the platform and its contents are owned by Delilah Technology Group LLC, its licensors, or other providers [delilah.tech]. A 2025 trademark filing for DELILAH also identifies Delilah Technology Group as the applicant for software tied to government legislation, civic engagement, and public events [Justia Trademarks, August 2025].

The public timeline is short but reasonably clear. The trademark application dates to August 2025, which is the earliest dated operating breadcrumb in the source set [Justia Trademarks, August 2025]. Company materials and third-party profiles indicate the app launched in January 2026, while the current product footprint spans a consumer app alongside Delilah Pro, a professional legislative tracking and analysis product for policy teams [Apple] [delilah.tech/pro]. Crunchbase records a $1.0 million seed round dated March 1, 2026, giving the company its first visible financing milestone in the public record [Crunchbase, March 2026].

Single-source, plausible -- This section relies on Crunchbase, company website materials, and a trademark filing, with partial corroboration on founding and product timeline but limited independent verification of operating milestones.

What They Have Built

MIXED The product surface is clearer than the underlying technology. Public materials describe Delilah as an AI-powered legislative intelligence platform focused on helping users search, understand, and track bills, legislators, and votes across all 50 states and Congress, with a consumer app alongside a professional offering for policy teams [delilah.tech] [Apple] [delilah.tech/pro]. The more specific enterprise product, Delilah Pro, is described by the company as providing AI bill search, side-by-side bill comparison, AI-generated reports, voting-record tracking, and real-time alerts, while an FSU profile and company team page separately describe automated analysis and real-time legislative tracking across all 50 states [delilah.tech/pro] [FSU News, June 2026] [delilahusa.com].

The public positioning suggests a two-sided product strategy rather than a single workflow tool. On the consumer side, the app store listing says users can ask Delilah about any bill, track legislative movement, and see voting activity, while the trademark filing frames the mobile application more broadly around legislation, civic engagement, and public events [Apple] [Justia Trademarks, August 2025]. On the professional side, Delilah Pro is explicitly aimed at policy professionals and government affairs teams, which implies a higher-value monitoring and research use case than the consumer civic-engagement product, though no verified demo, customer case study, or third-party technical review in the sourced materials establishes how differentiated the analysis layer is relative to existing legislative tracking software [delilah.tech/pro] [Christ School, March 2026].

What is still missing is as important as what is public. The available sources do not verify the underlying model architecture, data-ingestion pipeline, proprietary dataset design, security posture, or deployment model, and the only surfaced job listing was for a remote Final Cut Pro Editor internship rather than an engineering or data role, so there is little basis for a reliable tech-stack read beyond the company's repeated use of AI language in product descriptions [LinkedIn, August 2024] [delilah.tech/pro] [delilah.tech]. That leaves the current diligence question centered less on feature breadth, which is reasonably well described in public materials, and more on whether Delilah has built a defensible data and workflow layer for professionals rather than a useful but replicable interface on top of public legislative information [delilah.tech/pro] [FSU News, June 2026].

Unconfirmed -- This section relies heavily on company website descriptions and app-store copy, with limited independent corroboration from FSU News, Christ School, and the trademark filing.

Market Size and Demand

From the public record Legislative intelligence is a small category in public startup discourse, but the timing is not arbitrary: generative AI has lowered the cost of turning dense primary documents into searchable, explainable interfaces just as policy volatility has made faster bill tracking more valuable for both institutions and citizens [delilah.tech, Unknown] [Florida News Beep, April 2026] [Apple].

The public record does not provide a cited TAM, SAM, or SOM for Delilah specifically, and there is no named third-party market study in the source set that sizes AI legislative intelligence as a standalone market. What can be said from public evidence is narrower. Delilah is positioned at the intersection of government affairs software, legislative tracking, civic information, and consumer civic engagement, based on its own product descriptions and third-party profiles [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown] [Christ School, March 2026] [Justia Trademarks, August 2025]. That matters because the commercial buyer and the end user are not necessarily the same party. The professional product is described for policy professionals and government affairs teams, while the mobile app is framed for citizens and broader civic engagement, which suggests a B2B2C path rather than a single-market motion [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown] [Florida News Beep, April 2026].

A practical way to frame the addressable market is through adjacent spend pools rather than a precise top-down figure. On the consumer side, the adjacent market is less a paid software budget than attention, engagement, and possibly sponsored distribution around civic information. The product claim that users can discuss bills, track movement, and review votes places Delilah alongside civic information and news-consumption behaviors, not only enterprise workflow software [Apple] [Justia Trademarks, August 2025].

Demand drivers are visible even without a formal market report. First, legislation is structurally hard to parse for non-specialists, a problem Delilah's founder linked to firsthand experience in state government, according to Florida State University coverage [FSU News, June 2026]. Second, the company is pitching 50-state coverage and real-time tracking, which points to a data-volume problem that is a reasonable fit for AI-assisted search and summarization if accuracy holds up in practice [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown] [delilahusa.com]. Third, the same product can serve two urgency profiles: professionals who need monitoring and comparison tools, and citizens who want plain-language access to public proceedings [Christ School, March 2026] [Florida News Beep, April 2026]. That duality broadens theoretical reach, though it can also complicate go-to-market discipline.

The main regulatory and macro force here is not a single new law but the broader digitization of public records and rising expectations that government data should be accessible in real time. Delilah's product claims rely on the existence of machine-readable legislative text, voting data, and updates across states and Congress, and its value proposition improves as those inputs become more standardized and timely [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown] [delilah.tech, Unknown]. At the same time, this is a category where credibility matters more than novelty. If AI-generated bill summaries or comparisons are incomplete or imprecise, the product risks being treated as a convenience layer rather than a system of record. That does not invalidate the market, but it does suggest that trust, workflow integration, and citation fidelity are likely to matter as much as model quality.

Market frame	Relevance to Delilah	Public evidence
Legislative tracking software	Core professional workflow for bill monitoring, alerts, and comparison	Delilah Pro is described as an AI legislative intelligence platform for policy professionals and government affairs teams [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown]
Civic information and engagement apps	Core consumer distribution surface for citizens following legislation and public events	Trademark filing describes information, analysis, and discussion regarding legislation, civic engagement, and public events [Justia Trademarks, August 2025]
Government affairs and compliance budgets	Likely enterprise budget owner for paid adoption	Product is aimed at policy professionals and government affairs teams [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown]
News and research substitutes	Indirect substitute for how users currently follow bills and votes	App Store description says users can talk with Delilah about bills, track movement, and see votes [Apple]

The table points to a market that is better understood as a workflow overlap than as a single clean software category. For investors, the open question is whether Delilah becomes a daily-use intelligence product for professional teams, a broad civic interface for consumers, or a hybrid that can support both motions without diluting product focus.

Unconfirmed -- This section relies primarily on company materials and a small set of third-party profile pieces; no independent named market-sizing report was available in the provided public sources.

Who Else Is Fighting for This

Competitive set

MIXED Delilah is entering a crowded legislative intelligence market from the consumer-civic edge rather than from the established enterprise government-affairs center, which sets it apart in framing but not yet, on public evidence, in proven commercial depth [delilah.tech/pro] [Christ School, March 2026] [Justia Trademarks, August 2025].

Company	Positioning	Stage / Funding	Notable Differentiator	Source
Delilah Tech	AI legislative intelligence and mobile civic engagement across all 50 states and Congress	Seed, about $1,000,000 disclosed in March 2026	Combines consumer app positioning with professional bill search, comparison, reports, voting records, and alerts	[Crunchbase, March 2026] [delilah.tech/pro] [Apple]
FiscalNote	Legislative and regulatory intelligence platform	Public company	Established policy and regulatory workflow footprint with broader enterprise positioning	[FiscalNote]
Quorum	Public affairs software for government affairs teams	Acquired by FiscalNote in 2024	Workflow depth for public affairs and stakeholder management	[FiscalNote, January 2024] [Quorum]
BillTrack50	Legislative tracking and bill monitoring platform	Private	State bill tracking focus and established monitoring use case	[BillTrack50]
CapitolTrack	Legislative and regulatory tracking software	Private	Longstanding state and federal tracking orientation	[Capitol Track]
USLege	Legislative tracking and analysis platform	Private	Search and monitoring focused on U.S. legislation	[USLege]

The field breaks into three practical segments. Incumbents sit in enterprise government affairs and regulatory workflows, where FiscalNote and Quorum are oriented around professional users who need legislative tracking tied to team processes, reporting, and institutional accountability [FiscalNote] [Quorum]. A second group, including BillTrack50, CapitolTrack, and USLege, appears more narrowly centered on tracking and monitoring legislation itself, which matters because many buyers do not need a full public affairs suite if the core job is alerting, search, and comparison across jurisdictions [BillTrack50] [Capitol Track] [USLege]. Delilah is trying to straddle both the professional workflow and the citizen-information layer through Delilah Pro and a mobile app, a positioning choice supported by its own product materials and trademark filing, but one that also creates execution complexity because consumer distribution and enterprise retention are usually different businesses [delilah.tech/pro] [Apple] [Justia Trademarks, August 2025].

The edge visible today is not scale or capital. It is product framing. Public materials consistently show Delilah presenting legislative search, bill comparison, AI-generated reports, vote tracking, and real-time alerts in a package that is meant to be understandable to both policy professionals and ordinary users [delilah.tech/pro] [Florida News Beep, April 2026]. That can matter if the company is right that legislative data remains hard for non-specialists to use. Still, the durability of that edge looks perishable on current evidence. The underlying feature set, search, summaries, comparisons, alerts, and vote records, is close enough to the core jobs of existing tracking products that advantage will likely depend less on feature checklists than on distribution, proprietary workflow data, and account penetration, none of which is yet established publicly for Delilah [delilahusa.com] [BillTrack50] [Capitol Track].

The clearest exposure is to enterprise incumbency. FiscalNote and Quorum have the stronger claim on institutional workflows, procurement familiarity, and professional policy teams, while narrower tracking products such as BillTrack50 may have an easier time winning buyers who want state-level monitoring without adopting a broader civic-engagement narrative [FiscalNote] [Quorum] [BillTrack50]. Delilah also does not appear, from public evidence, to own a privileged distribution channel into legislatures, agencies, or large trade associations. Its current public story runs through founder background, school-linked profiles, and company pages rather than named customer deployments or procurement references, which leaves the go-to-market motion comparatively unproven [FSU News, June 2026] [Christ School, March 2026] [delilahusa.com].

The most plausible 18-month scenario is bifurcation rather than direct displacement. FiscalNote is the winner if buyers continue to prefer integrated, enterprise-grade policy workflows from known vendors, especially where procurement risk matters and legislative tracking is only one module in a larger public affairs stack [FiscalNote]. Delilah is the winner if its mobile-first, plain-language product experience converts into a repeatable wedge with smaller policy teams, advocacy groups, or users who are underserved by incumbent software complexity, then successfully upsells into Delilah Pro [Apple] [delilah.tech/pro]. The most exposed player in that scenario is a narrow tracker such as USLege or CapitolTrack if buyers polarize toward either full-suite incumbents or AI-native products with broader user reach, though that remains a conditional inference rather than an observed market shift [USLege] [Capitol Track].

Unconfirmed -- This section mixes one independent funding source with company materials and competitor websites; public evidence for Delilah's differentiation and commercial standing remains largely company- or profile-based.

Opportunity

Upside case

PUBLIC The prize here is larger than a niche govtech tool if Delilah can convert legislative search into the default interface for tracking, comparing, and discussing U.S. lawmaking across both professional and public audiences [delilah.tech, Unknown] [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown] [Justia Trademarks, August 2025].

The clearest upside is a two-sided legislative intelligence platform that starts as software for policy professionals and government affairs teams, then compounds through broader consumer attention and engagement. Public evidence shows Delilah is already presenting that dual surface: Delilah Pro is positioned as an AI legislative intelligence platform for policy professionals and government affairs teams, while the app is described as a mobile product for citizens and policy professionals to follow legislation, votes, and public events [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown] [Christ School, March 2026] [Apple]. That matters because the legislative workflow is fragmented today. Professionals need speed, coverage, and alerts; citizens need translation and usability. A company that can serve both with one data and analysis layer has a path to become a system of record for legislative monitoring rather than a single-purpose app. The outcome is still early and company-led in sourcing, but the architecture of the opportunity is visible in the product claims and launch narrative [FSU News, June 2026] [Florida News Beep, April 2026].

A plausible reason this is reachable, rather than pure aspiration, is that Delilah appears to have chosen a wedge where information density is high and usability is historically weak. The company says Delilah Pro covers bills across all 50 states, supports side-by-side comparison, AI-generated reports, voting record tracking, and real-time alerts [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown]. Separately, its trademark filing describes a mobile application for information, analysis, and discussion around legislation and civic engagement [Justia Trademarks, August 2025]. If those capabilities are functional at acceptable quality, Delilah is not trying to invent demand from scratch. It is trying to compress an existing but cumbersome workflow into a simpler interface.

Scenario	What happens	Catalyst	Why it's plausible
Pro workflow winner	Delilah Pro becomes a daily legislative monitoring tool for government affairs teams, advocacy groups, and policy professionals that need 50-state coverage and faster analysis.	A reliable enterprise sales motion around all-50-state monitoring and AI-generated reporting [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown].	The product is already publicly positioned around search, comparison, reporting, voting records, and real-time alerts for policy teams, which maps to recurring professional workflows [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown].
Consumer-to-professional funnel	The mobile app builds a broad user base among citizens tracking bills and votes, and a portion of those users convert into professional or institutional demand.	Continued app adoption after the January 2026 launch reported by local coverage, plus product features that let users talk with the app about any bill and track legislative movement [WTXL] [Apple].	Delilah has publicly described both a consumer app and a professional product, suggesting a deliberate B2B2C structure rather than a later adjacency [Christ School, March 2026] [Florida News Beep, April 2026].
Legislative data layer	Delilah evolves from app plus dashboard into the underlying legislative intelligence layer used by third parties, including media, civic organizations, or workflow software vendors.	Expansion of the current search and analysis stack into a reusable data or alerting layer built on nationwide bill and vote coverage [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown] [delilah.tech, Unknown].	The company already frames itself around bill search, automated analysis, and real-time tracking across all 50 states and Congress, which is the kind of normalized dataset that can support multiple front ends if execution holds [delilahusa.com, Unknown] [delilah.tech, Unknown].

The compounding mechanism is straightforward if the underlying data quality is real. Every new legislative query, tracked bill, comparison workflow, and alert configuration can improve product relevance, reveal which summaries users trust, and deepen the metadata around bills, legislators, and voting records. On the distribution side, a public-facing app can lower acquisition cost by creating brand familiarity before a professional team buys the higher-value product. The available evidence only establishes that Delilah is attempting this loop, not that it has achieved it: the company markets a consumer app, a professional platform, and real-time tracking across all 50 states, while outside coverage describes the product as making legislation easier to understand and engage with in real time [Apple] [delilah.tech/pro, Unknown] [FSU News, June 2026] [Christ School, March 2026]. Even at this stage, that combination is more interesting than a single-surface compliance tool because it creates at least the possibility of shared data infrastructure supporting multiple monetization paths.

The upper bound is best framed through public comparables, though investors should treat this as scenario analysis rather than a forecast. FiscalNote, one of the named competitors in this market, is a public company focused on policy and global intelligence software [FiscalNote, March 2026]. If Delilah were to win the "Pro workflow winner" scenario and mature into a scaled legislative intelligence platform with durable enterprise adoption, the value could plausibly be measured against the lower end of public policy-software outcomes rather than civic-media outcomes (scenario, not a forecast) [FiscalNote, March 2026]. Public evidence in this packet does not support a tighter valuation range, market size figure, or revenue benchmark, so the practical point is narrower: the category has produced venture-scale companies before, and Delilah's decision to pair a professional workflow product with a mass-market civic interface gives it a path, however early, to aim at that tier rather than a small specialist software niche.

Inferred, not confirmed -- Core upside logic relies on company product pages and local/profile coverage, with limited independent validation of adoption, customers, or market scale.

Sources