Exurgy
Building the internet of power through agentic energy orchestration.
Website: https://exurgy.ai/
Cover Block
Open sources
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | Exurgy |
| Tagline | Building the internet of power through agentic energy orchestration. [Exurgy] |
| Headquarters | Austin, US [Exurgy] |
| Founded | 2026 [Exurgy] |
| Stage | Pre-Seed |
| Industry | Cleantech / Climatetech |
| Technology | AI / Machine Learning |
| Geography | North America |
| Founding Team | Ted Moskovitz, Eric Bravick, Matt McKibbin, Krisbell Robles [tedmoskovitz.com] [LinkedIn, October 2026] [LinkedIn] |
| Funding Label | Pre-Seed |
Links
Open sources
- Website: https://exurgy.ai/
- GitHub: https://github.com/exurgy/.github
What an Investor Needs First
PUBLIC Exurgy is an Austin-based stealth energy software startup that says it is building "the internet of power" through "agentic energy orchestration," a framing that merits attention because very few public energy startups are staking out an AI-native control layer this early in their life cycle [Exurgy] [Ted Moskovitz] [LinkedIn, October 2026]. The public record is thin, but what is visible suggests a company formed in 2026 around a software-first thesis rather than a hardware or project-development model, with Exurgy’s homepage describing the company as in stealth and based in Austin, Texas [Exurgy] [Bizapedia].
The differentiation claim, to the extent it can be verified publicly, rests on orchestration: Exurgy is not presenting itself as a generator, storage developer, or equipment vendor, but as a coordination layer for power systems using AI agents [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026]. That is conceptually interesting in a market where distributed energy assets and grid complexity create room for software abstraction, although the company has not yet disclosed product architecture, customer segments, pricing, or deployment evidence in public sources [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026].
The founding bench appears eclectic rather than conventionally utility-native. Ted Moskovitz is identified as co-founder and COO, with a background that includes SEC legal work and founding DecentraNet, while Eric Bravick is listed as CEO and Matt McKibbin as co-founder; separate public profiles also indicate Krisbell Robles joined as a cofounder [Ted Moskovitz] [Forbes, March 2018] [LinkedIn, October 2026] [Krisbell Robles]. Several of those biographies lean toward investing, blockchain media, and operating experience outside traditional power markets, which does not weaken the thesis by itself, but it does mean investors will want evidence that the team can translate an ambitious systems concept into utility-grade or enterprise-grade execution [Forbes, July 2021] [DeFiance Media] [Hyla Funds, retrieved 2026].
There is no confirmed public funding round, no named investors, and no verified commercial traction yet, so the company should be read as pre-seed and pre-disclosure rather than underfollowed growth stage [Bizapedia] [Exurgy]. The next 12 to 18 months will matter less for narrative and more for proof: investors should watch for a first financing announcement, clearer articulation of the buyer, and any public evidence of pilots, partnerships, or live orchestration deployments that demonstrate the software can move from slogan to operating system [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026].
Claim stands unchecked -- This section relies primarily on company-owned materials, founder websites, and LinkedIn profiles, with limited independent corroboration from Bizapedia and prior publisher coverage of individual founders.
Taxonomy Snapshot
| Axis | Value |
|---|---|
| Stage | Pre-Seed |
| Industry / Vertical | Cleantech / Climatetech |
| Technology Type | AI / Machine Learning |
| Geography | North America |
| Founding Team | Co-Founders (3+) |
| Funding | Pre-Seed |
Inside the Company
PUBLIC
Exurgy presents as a very early company with only a narrow public record so far. Its website describes the business as a stealth company "building the internet of power through agentic energy orchestration," and the same page places the company in Austin, Texas, with a 2026 copyright date that is consistent with a newly formed venture [Exurgy]. A Texas business record also points to Exurgy, Inc. in Austin, which supports the existence of a legal entity, though the filing excerpt surfaced here does not add operating detail beyond registration-level information [Bizapedia].
The chronology is thin but readable. The most concrete public milestone is the appearance of the company website and state-level business listing, both of which indicate an Austin-based entity operating in stealth and oriented around software for energy coordination rather than a disclosed hardware footprint [Exurgy] [Bizapedia]. Public materials available in the cited company and filing sources do not yet establish a launch date, customer base, financing history, or product deployment timeline, so the current view is best framed as pre-launch company formation rather than commercial execution [Exurgy] [Bizapedia].
Claim stands unchecked -- This section relies on a company website and a single business-directory filing source, with no independent public reporting or confirmed state filing details beyond the surfaced listing.
Under the Hood
MIXED
The public product record is thin, but the core claim is at least clear. Exurgy describes itself as "a stealth company building the internet of power through agentic energy orchestration" on its website, and the same positioning appears on founder profiles tied to the company [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026]. Taken literally, that suggests a software layer intended to coordinate power-system assets or workflows using AI agents, rather than a disclosed hardware, generation, or storage product. The narrower point is what matters here: the company has stated a category and a design philosophy, but it has not publicly detailed the underlying architecture, supported asset classes, deployment model, or user workflow [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026].
That absence limits how far product analysis can go without drifting into invention. There is no verified public demo, technical documentation, pricing page, customer case study, or named integration partner in the source set, and no job postings that would support even cautious tech-stack inference [Exurgy] [Bizapedia] [LinkedIn, October 2026]. The company is operating in stealth by its own description, so the practical read is that Exurgy has chosen to expose branding and thesis before exposing implementation. For investors, that keeps the product discussion centered on concept fit rather than execution proof: "agentic energy orchestration" is an intelligible wedge for a distributed-energy software business, but the public record does not yet establish whether the initial product is aimed at utilities, asset operators, energy traders, or enterprise energy managers [Exurgy].
Claim stands unchecked -- This section relies primarily on company website language, with limited corroboration from founder LinkedIn profiles and no independent public technical documentation or demo coverage.
Market Research
Open sources
The market matters now because software that can coordinate distributed power assets sits at the intersection of two durable trends, grid complexity and the push to apply AI tooling to operational systems, even though Exurgy itself has not yet disclosed enough to place the company inside a defined commercial segment [Exurgy].
Public evidence on Exurgy is thin, so any market sizing here has to be framed through analogous categories rather than as a direct measure of the company's addressable market. The company describes itself only as a stealth business building "the internet of power through agentic energy orchestration" [Exurgy]. That language points toward software for managing energy assets, workflows, or market participation, but the target asset class, customer type, and deployment scope are not publicly specified, which means TAM, SAM, and SOM cannot be credibly calculated from disclosed facts alone [Exurgy].
A more careful way to read the opportunity is through adjacent public market frames. If Exurgy is building control software for distributed energy resources, its relevant analogs could include distributed energy resource management systems, virtual power plant software, grid optimization, or broader energy management platforms. If the emphasis is instead on "agentic" workflow software, the nearer analog may be industrial AI orchestration applied to energy operations rather than a pure power market product. Public materials do not resolve that distinction, so investors should treat any market map at this stage as directional rather than company-specific [Exurgy].
| Analogous market frame | What it suggests for Exurgy | Evidence status |
|---|---|---|
| Distributed energy resource software | Possible fit if Exurgy coordinates batteries, solar, EV charging, or flexible loads | Inference from company tagline only [Exurgy] |
| Virtual power plant software | Possible fit if Exurgy aggregates dispatchable assets into market-facing capacity | Inference from company tagline only [Exurgy] |
| Energy management and grid optimization software | Possible fit if the product is enterprise or utility control software | Inference from company tagline only [Exurgy] |
| Industrial AI orchestration | Possible fit if the core product is agent software rather than energy-market infrastructure | Inference from company tagline only [Exurgy] |
The table shows the central issue in this market read: the broad opportunity is understandable, but the exact segment remains unspecified in public. Until Exurgy names a buyer and operating domain, market sizing is better handled as a set of adjacent possibilities than as a single quantified claim.
Demand drivers are easier to outline than market size because they flow from the problem category implied by the company's own description. Energy systems are becoming harder to coordinate as more distributed assets come online and as operators are asked to optimize cost, reliability, and carbon outcomes at the same time. Software that can orchestrate decisions across fragmented assets or workflows has an intuitive place in that environment, especially if buyers are trying to reduce manual intervention. That said, the existence of a real demand driver for the category does not establish that Exurgy has identified the right customer wedge or product boundary [Exurgy].
The adjacent and substitute markets also matter because they shape how buyers may compare any future Exurgy product. A utility or large energy operator could address a coordination problem through incumbent grid software, in-house optimization tools, energy management platforms, or service-heavy integrators rather than through a new standalone startup product. By the same logic, if Exurgy's differentiation rests more on the agent layer than on proprietary access to energy assets or market rails, it may find itself compared not only with energy software vendors but also with general-purpose industrial AI tools adapted for power-sector use. Public sources do not yet indicate which side of that comparison is more relevant [Exurgy].
Regulatory and macro forces are likely to be supportive in a general sense, but the public record is not yet specific enough to tie Exurgy to a defined policy catalyst. In energy software, the usual tailwinds include grid modernization spending, pressure to integrate distributed resources, and a broader enterprise willingness to test AI-based operational systems. Those forces can create budget openings, but procurement cycles in energy infrastructure are often slow and risk-sensitive, which tends to favor startups that can show either clear economic uplift or low-friction deployment. Exurgy's stealth posture means there is no public evidence yet on whether it is aiming at utilities, asset owners, commercial operators, or another buyer set with a different regulatory exposure [Exurgy].
Claim stands unchecked -- This section relies primarily on Exurgy's own website language and uses adjacent market framing as analysis rather than as company-specific verified market sizing [Exurgy].
Competition and Substitutes
MIXED Exurgy is positioned, at least from its own sparse public materials, less as a hardware energy company and more as a software coordination layer for power systems, but the public record is too thin to place it cleanly against named rivals yet [Exurgy].
The first constraint here is evidentiary rather than strategic. Exurgy’s website says it is in stealth and is building “the internet of power through agentic energy orchestration,” with Austin, Texas listed as its location [Exurgy]. That leaves only a cautious segment map: Exurgy appears closest to energy software orchestration, while potential alternatives in practice could include incumbent utility software vendors, distributed energy resource management systems, and internal tools built by power-market participants, but those categories are inference rather than company-stated positioning [Exurgy].
On what can be defended today, the edge is conceptual rather than proven. The company is using a specific framing, “agentic energy orchestration,” that suggests an attempt to apply AI-driven coordination to energy workflows rather than to generation hardware itself [Exurgy]. If that framing eventually translates into a real product advantage, the durable moat would likely need to come from proprietary operating data, customer integrations, or regulatory know-how in energy markets, none of which is yet evidenced publicly; by contrast, language alone is perishable because adjacent software teams can adopt similar AI orchestration claims quickly [Exurgy].
The exposure is clearer than the moat. Exurgy’s public materials do not show customers, partners, financing, or an operating footprint, and the leadership signals that are public point to a founding group whose documented backgrounds include investing, media, legal work, and go-to-market experience more than publicly evidenced power-system operating depth [Ted Moskovitz] [LinkedIn, October 2026] [Forbes, July 2021] [Hyla Funds]. That does not preclude a strong energy product, but it does mean any incumbent utility-tech vendor or specialist energy software startup with live deployments, reference customers, and existing integrations would begin with an advantage on procurement trust and implementation credibility, based on the evidence available here [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026].
The most plausible 18-month scenario is still binary because the company is pre-disclosure. Exurgy is the winner if its current stealth period ends with a clearly defined wedge, for example a disclosed orchestration product tied to a specific energy workflow and early customer proof, because that would convert an abstract category claim into a real competitive position [Exurgy]. Exurgy is also the most likely loser if the company remains defined mainly by founder profiles and slogan-level positioning, because in software categories adjacent to AI operations, the market usually rewards the team that shows deployments and data first, not the team that frames the category first [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026].
Claim stands unchecked -- This section relies primarily on company materials and founder profiles, with no independently confirmed competitor set, customer disclosures, or market-share evidence in the supplied public sources.
Opportunity
PUBLIC
The prize here is unusually large if Exurgy can turn a minimal public footprint into working software that becomes the control layer for distributed energy assets, because the companies that sit between fragmented infrastructure and market participation tend to capture durable workflow ownership once they are embedded [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026].
The clearest upside case is that Exurgy becomes a software coordination layer for power systems rather than a single application vendor. That reading starts with the only company-authored positioning now on the record: Exurgy says it is "building the internet of power through agentic energy orchestration" and describes itself as a stealth company based in Austin [Exurgy]. In plain English, that suggests ambition to coordinate many nodes, devices, or operating decisions across an energy network, not merely sell a point solution. The reason that outcome is reachable, rather than pure slogan, is the founding pattern. Public profiles show a multi-founder team assembled in late 2026, with Eric Bravick listed as CEO, Ted Moskovitz as co-founder and COO, and Matt McKibbin as co-founder, which is at least consistent with a company moving from concept to build stage [LinkedIn, October 2026] [Ted Moskovitz]. The evidence does not yet show customers, financing, or product detail, so the opportunity rests on category ambition and team formation more than operating proof.
A reasonable public-upside map is narrower than the tagline but still substantial. If Exurgy can become the decisioning and orchestration layer that helps commercial asset owners, power market participants, or distributed energy operators coordinate assets through software agents, it could occupy a valuable position between physical infrastructure and market execution [Exurgy]. That position matters because orchestration software can compound: once deployed into energy workflows, it can expand from monitoring or dispatch support into optimization, settlement, forecasting, and portfolio-level control. No public evidence confirms that sequence is under way at Exurgy today, but the company language points toward a platform-shaped problem, not a one-feature product [Exurgy].
| Scenario | What happens | Catalyst | Why it's plausible |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control layer for distributed assets | Exurgy launches software that coordinates a growing base of energy assets or workflows and becomes the operating layer customers use daily | A first disclosed commercial deployment or pilot with measurable operational scope | The company explicitly frames itself around "agentic energy orchestration" and "the internet of power," which implies a multi-asset coordination thesis rather than a hardware bet [Exurgy] |
| AI-native operating system for energy teams | Exurgy wins users first at the workflow level, then expands into automation across forecasting, dispatch, and exception handling | Product launch that shows software agents handling specific energy operations tasks | The public positioning centers on agents, and the current team appears to have been assembled recently enough to suggest a build-first phase rather than a legacy product transition [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026] |
| Infrastructure bridge between capital and operations | Exurgy uses founder networks to connect software orchestration with asset owners, developers, or investors looking for better control of distributed power portfolios | A named strategic partner, investor, or portfolio operator validates the product in market | Ted Moskovitz's public record includes founding DecentraNet and investor activity, while Matt McKibbin's profile links him to DeFiance Media and early-stage advisory work, which may help with access even if it does not prove energy distribution today [Forbes, March 2018] [Forbes, July 2021] [DeFiance Media] |
The compounding mechanism, if this works, is not consumer-style network effects but workflow lock-in and data advantage. Orchestration products improve as they ingest more operating contexts, asset states, and exception cases, especially if the software is meant to make or recommend decisions across fragmented energy environments. Each successful deployment can widen the training set for future automations and raise switching costs, because customers are less likely to rip out software that sits inside dispatch, optimization, or coordination loops. Public evidence of that flywheel starting does not yet exist. What does exist is a company-level claim to an orchestration role, plus a founding team with a mix of operating, legal, investor, and go-to-market backgrounds that could be useful in a market where regulation, counterparties, and commercialization all matter [Exurgy] [Ted Moskovitz] [LinkedIn, October 2026] [Hyla Funds].
The size of the win is therefore best framed as scenario value, not current evidence. There is no sourced market-size figure or direct public comparable in the record for Exurgy, so a precise valuation framework would overstate what the sources support. Still, if Exurgy were to become a core orchestration layer for distributed power operations, the outcome could resemble a category infrastructure company rather than a niche application vendor (scenario, not a forecast) [Exurgy]. On the present record, the upside case is large because the problem category is structurally important and the company's language targets that layer directly, but the probability cannot yet be underwritten from public traction data.
Claim stands unchecked -- This section relies primarily on company website language and founder profiles, with no independent public confirmation of product adoption, funding, customers, or market size [Exurgy] [LinkedIn, October 2026] [Ted Moskovitz].
Sources
Open sources
[Exurgy] Exurgy | https://exurgy.ai/
[tedmoskovitz.com] Ted Moskovitz | Founder & Investor, Exurgy and DecentraNet | https://tedmoskovitz.com/
[LinkedIn, October 2026] Ted Moskovitz | LinkedIn | https://www.linkedin.com/in/tedmoskovitz
[Bizapedia] EXURGY, INC. in Austin, TX | Company Information & Reviews | https://www.bizapedia.com/tx/exurgy-inc.html
[Ted Moskovitz] Ted Moskovitz | Founder & Investor, Exurgy and DecentraNet | https://tedmoskovitz.com/
[Forbes, March 2018] Meet The Woman Advising The World's Top Blockchain Companies | https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisawinning/2018/03/02/meet-the-woman-advising-the-worlds-top-blockchain-companies/
[Krisbell Robles] Krisbell Robles - Kris Trabajo Remoto (@kristrabajoremoto) | LinkedIn | https://www.linkedin.com/in/krisbell-robles-791b26208/
[Forbes, July 2021] DeFiance Media Launches To Cover Blockchain-Based DeFi Business And Culture | https://www.forbes.com/sites/dbloom/2021/07/23/defiance-media-launches-to-cover-blockchain-based-defi-business-and-culture/
[DeFiance Media] DeFiance Media | https://www.defiancemedia.com/
[Hyla Funds, retrieved 2026] Hyla Funds | https://www.hylafunds.com/
[LinkedIn] Krisbell Robles - Kris Trabajo Remoto (@kristrabajoremoto) | LinkedIn | https://www.linkedin.com/in/krisbell-robles-791b26208/
Articles about Exurgy
- Exurgy's Founders Are Building the Internet of Power From Austin — The stealth startup, led by a former regulator and a blockchain investor, is assembling a team to coordinate distributed energy assets with AI.