LO:TECH
A capital markets firm providing high-frequency trading, market making, and data across crypto and traditional venues.
Website: https://lo.tech/
Cover Block
From the public record
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | LO:TECH |
| Tagline | A capital markets firm providing high-frequency trading, market making, and data across crypto and traditional venues. [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] |
| Headquarters | London, UK [Tech Funding News, November 2026] |
| Founded | 2023 [Tech Funding News, November 2026] |
| Stage | Series A [Tech Funding News, November 2026] |
| Business Model | B2B |
| Industry | Fintech |
| Technology | Blockchain / Web3 |
| Geography | Global / Remote-First |
| Growth Profile | Venture Scale |
| Founding Team | Tim Meggs, Marcus Horsley, Alex Williams [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [The Cryptonomist, November 2026] |
| Funding Label | Series A |
| Total Disclosed Funding | $18.6 million (seed: $1.6 million, seed: $5 million, Series A: $12 million) [LO:TECH, October 2026] [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026] |
Links
From the public record
- Website: https://lo.tech/
- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/7vFmJdlTLoOFLWNnuuOe39
- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/60Z7IOB0WbXNbpsDGzWWSg
- Careers: https://careers.lo.tech/
The Short Version
From the public record LO:TECH is a London-based capital markets firm building high-frequency trading, market making, execution, and market-data infrastructure across crypto, prediction markets, and selected traditional venues, and it merits investor attention because it has already raised $18.6 million across disclosed rounds while positioning itself around the harder operational problem of 24/7, cross-venue liquidity rather than a single application layer [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [LO:TECH, August 2025] [LO:TECH, October 2026]. Founded in 2023, the company presents itself as a bridge between centralized exchanges, DeFi markets, and newer regulated event markets, with a stated product scope that includes proprietary trading, data distribution, and execution technology [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [LO:TECH, August 2025].
The current product story centers on two linked surfaces: Market Making as a Service for token issuers and institutional liquidity clients, and normalized market-data distribution that now includes licensed Kalshi data and pricing streamed on Pyth Pro, according to the company and third-party coverage [LO:TECH, October 2026] [European Business Magazine, July 2026] [lo.tech, retrieved 2024]. The differentiation claim is not that any one feature is unique in isolation, but that the same trading infrastructure supports market making, execution, and data products across continuously operating venues, which could matter if institutions increasingly want one provider across crypto and adjacent market structures [a-teaminsight.com, retrieved 2026] [Tech Funding News, November 2026].
The founding team combines market and media backgrounds that are somewhat unusual for the category. Tim Meggs is identified by the company as co-founder and CEO, and Reuters previously reported his promotion to partner at Fulcrum Asset Management in 2015, while Marcus Horsley is identified in coverage as co-founder and CTO and Alex Williams is identified as a co-founder with prior work at TechCrunch and The New Stack [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Reuters, December 2015] [The Cryptonomist, November 2026] [TechCrunch, July 2012] [TechCrunch].
On financing, the company disclosed a $5 million seed round led by 13books Capital in August 2025 and a $12 million Series A led by MMC in November 2026, following an earlier $1.6 million seed announcement led by Lightspeed Faction; the available sources do not fully reconcile how the two seed rounds relate, but the disclosed total reaches about $18.6 million [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [LO:TECH, October 2026]. The business model is B2B, aimed at institutional trading, token issuer, and market-data customers, and Tech Funding News reported that LO:TECH serves more than 50 clients, including public companies, though customer names and revenue concentration are not disclosed publicly [Tech Funding News, November 2026].
Over the next 12 to 18 months, the public markers worth watching are whether the Series A translates into durable expansion in the US and Asia-Pacific, whether the firm can turn its market-data and MMaaS offerings into visible distribution beyond crypto-native buyers, and whether public evidence of client quality begins to catch up with the breadth of the product narrative [TokenPost, November 2026] [Tech Funding News, November 2026]. The setup is promising, but much of the operating detail still rests on company statements, so the central diligence question is execution credibility at scale rather than conceptual market fit [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [LO:TECH, October 2026].
Unconfirmed -- This section combines independent reporting on funding, founders, and expansion plans with several material product and capability claims that remain company-sourced or only partially corroborated.
Taxonomy Snapshot
| Axis | Value |
|---|---|
| Stage | Series A |
| Business Model | B2B |
| Industry / Vertical | Fintech |
| Technology Type | Blockchain / Web3 |
| Geography | Global / Remote-First |
| Growth Profile | Venture Scale |
| Founding Team | Co-Founders (3+) |
| Funding | Disclosed total of about $18.6M |
The Company in Brief
From the public record
LO:TECH presents as a London-based capital markets firm built for continuously operating markets rather than exchange hours inherited from traditional finance [lo.tech]. The company says it was founded in 2023 and describes its scope as proprietary trading, market-data distribution, liquidity provision, market making, and execution technology across crypto and traditional venues [lo.tech].
The public record in the cited company materials points to three co-founders: Tim Meggs, Marcus Horsley, and Alex Williams [LO:TECH, August 2025]. On its own timeline, the first visible financing milestone was a $5 million seed round announced in August 2025, led by 13books Capital, which the company framed as fuel for its next stage of growth in onchain capital markets [LO:TECH, August 2025].
The business then added a second disclosed seed financing of $1.6 million in October 2026, led by Lightspeed Faction, alongside the launch of its Market Making as a Service offering [LO:TECH, October 2026]. By November 2026, LO:TECH had also announced a $12 million Series A led by MMC, taking total disclosed funding to about $18.6 million and marking a shift from early product buildout toward geographic expansion and broader institutional distribution [LO:TECH, August 2025] [LO:TECH, October 2026] [lo.tech].
Unconfirmed -- This section relies primarily on company website and company announcement materials, with no Crunchbase or state filing evidence used here.
What They Have Built
MIXED
LO:TECH presents itself less as a single software surface and more as a trading infrastructure stack that spans proprietary trading, market-data distribution, liquidity provision, market making, and execution technology across crypto, traditional finance, and prediction-market venues [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [LO:TECH, August 2025]. That matters because the public evidence points to a business built around market structure plumbing rather than a narrow token-market-making tool. On the product side, the clearest named offerings are its Market Making as a Service product, which the company launched alongside its $1.6 million seed announcement, and its data products, which include low-latency live feeds, websocket replay, daily CSVs, and a historical API across more than 30 centralized and decentralized venues, according to company materials [LO:TECH, October 2026] [LO:TECH, retrieved 2024].
The externally visible differentiation is the attempt to unify several venue types inside one operating layer. LO:TECH says its pricing streams on Pyth Pro and that it is a licensed distributor of Kalshi market data, giving it exposure to both crypto pricing infrastructure and regulated event-market data [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [European Business Magazine, July 2026]. Reporting and company statements also describe the MMaaS platform as being built on LO:TECH's proprietary trading infrastructure and offering clients dashboard-based controls, real-time visibility, and reporting, although those workflow claims rely mainly on company-linked or lightly corroborated coverage rather than independent product documentation [A-Team Insight, retrieved 2026] [CryptoSlate, retrieved 2026].
A small amount of implementation detail can be inferred from hiring, but the inference should stay narrow. A Data Engineer role on the careers site calls for strong analytical ability and an advanced degree in a quantitative field, which is directionally consistent with a data-intensive, latency-sensitive environment, but it does not by itself establish the full internal stack (inferred from job postings) [LO:TECH Careers, retrieved 2024]. Public materials also show hiring interest in HFT algo traders, which fits the firm's stated focus on high-frequency trading and liquidity operations, though not every listed role can be confirmed as currently open [Alex Williams - Low Observable Technology | LinkedIn, retrieved 2026] [Tim Meggs - Low Observable Technology | LinkedIn, retrieved 2026].
Unconfirmed -- This section relies materially on company website and company announcement claims, with partial corroboration from trade press on Kalshi distribution and MMaaS positioning.
Market Size and Demand
From the public record
The market matters now because LO:TECH is positioned at the intersection of three public trends that have each moved from niche to institutional relevance: always-on digital-asset trading, the normalization of token market making as a service, and the packaging of alternative market data for professional users [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [European Business Magazine, July 2026].
The available record does not support a clean TAM, SAM, and SOM build for LO:TECH’s exact category, and that gap is material. Public sources confirm the company operates across proprietary trading, market-data distribution, liquidity provision, market making, and execution technology for centralized exchanges, DeFi venues, traditional finance, and prediction markets [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [LO:TECH, October 2026]. That breadth means the addressable market is better understood as a stack of adjacent revenue pools rather than one neatly bounded software category. In practical terms, the relevant demand base includes token issuers that need exchange liquidity support, institutional traders that need normalized low-latency feeds, and firms looking for cross-venue execution in markets that trade continuously [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026].
What can be said with confidence is that the company is pointed at customer workflows that become more valuable as market structure fragments. LO:TECH’s own materials and third-party coverage consistently describe a unified infrastructure spanning centralized crypto venues, DeFi, traditional markets, and prediction markets, with the pitch centered on one operating layer for data, pricing, and execution across these venues [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [TokenPost, November 2026]. If that framing is directionally right, the commercial opportunity is less about end-user crypto adoption in the abstract and more about the cost imposed by fragmented venue connectivity and the need for institutional-grade tooling in 24/7 markets [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [The Cryptonomist, November 2026].
Demand drivers in the cited record are concrete, even if they are not quantified by third-party market studies here. First, token issuers continue to need structured liquidity support and exchange relationship management, which LO:TECH addresses through its Market Making as a Service product [LO:TECH, October 2026] [CryptoSlate]. Second, professional trading firms and other institutional users increasingly value normalized, replayable, and historical data across venues, especially when it can be consumed through standard APIs rather than custom integrations for each exchange [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [FOW]. Third, prediction markets are becoming a closer adjacent market, not just an experimental one, as shown by LO:TECH’s licensed distribution of Kalshi data into the same broader data stack it sells to institutional clients [European Business Magazine, July 2026] [FOW].
A small table is more useful than a chart here because the public evidence is qualitative on market size but specific on which adjacent markets matter.
| Market segment | Relevance to LO:TECH | Public evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Token market making | Direct customer set for MMaaS | LO:TECH says MMaaS helps token issuers manage liquidity and exchange relationships [LO:TECH, October 2026] |
| Institutional market data | Direct product surface | LO:TECH markets live, historical, and normalized feeds across 30+ venues [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] |
| Cross-venue execution | Direct product surface | Series A coverage cites expansion of execution services across traditional finance, digital assets, and prediction markets [Tech Funding News, November 2026] |
| Prediction-market data | Adjacent expansion area | LO:TECH is a licensed distributor of Kalshi market data [European Business Magazine, July 2026] [FOW] |
The table points to a company selling into overlapping infrastructure budgets rather than one isolated crypto line item. That usually broadens opportunity, but it also means category comparables can be misleading unless they account for data, execution, and liquidity services together.
The substitute markets are just as important as the adjacent ones. A token issuer can buy market-making support from a specialist desk, build an internal trading function, or work with exchanges and brokers that bundle parts of the same service stack, according to the product framing in LO:TECH’s materials [LO:TECH, October 2026] [LO:TECH, August 2025]. On the data side, institutional users can rely on exchange-native feeds, specialist market-data vendors, or internal normalization layers instead of outsourcing that function [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [FOW]. That matters because demand may exist without necessarily accruing to a single integrated provider.
Regulatory and macro forces cut both ways, which is typical for this market. The constructive side is that more institutional participation tends to reward firms that can offer cleaner data provenance, regulated venue access, and consistent operational controls across asset classes [European Business Magazine, July 2026] [Tech Funding News, November 2026]. LO:TECH’s emphasis on "clean liquidity" and its distribution of Kalshi data suggest an attempt to align with that shift toward more rules-based market infrastructure, even if those claims remain partly company-framed [13books Capital] [European Business Magazine, July 2026]. The limiting side is that cross-border crypto, DeFi, and prediction-market activity remains exposed to changing venue rules, listing standards, and data licensing terms, so a large part of market attractiveness depends on whether institutions keep expanding their participation rather than pulling back during periods of regulatory friction [TokenPost, November 2026] [The Cryptonomist, November 2026].
Single-source, plausible -- This section relies on a mix of company materials and third-party coverage, with no independent third-party TAM study for LO:TECH's exact category in the provided source set.
Who Else Is Fighting for This
Competitive map
MIXED LO:TECH is positioned less as a single-product crypto market maker and more as a cross-venue trading infrastructure firm, which places it against several different classes of alternative rather than one clean peer set [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026].
That matters because the company’s public materials describe four businesses under one roof: proprietary trading, market-data distribution, market making, and execution technology [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [LO:TECH, October 2026]. In practice, each of those surfaces has a different competitive map. On token market making, the relevant alternatives are specialist crypto liquidity firms and exchange-affiliated liquidity networks, though the structured public record provided here does not name direct competitors by company [LO:TECH, October 2026]. On market data, the comparison set shifts toward venue-native feeds and normalized data distributors, especially where LO:TECH is pitching low-latency delivery across more than 30 centralized and decentralized venues [LO:TECH, retrieved 2024]. On prediction-market data, its licensed Kalshi distribution introduces a more regulated niche where access and formatting quality can matter as much as raw speed [europeanbusinessmagazine.com, July 2026] [fow.com, retrieved 2026].
The company’s own route to market also suggests who it is trying to displace. LO:TECH says its market-making service helps token issuers manage exchange relationships, and it names Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Gate.io in connection with that service [LO:TECH, October 2026]. That implies a substitute set that includes in-house issuer treasury teams, boutique advisory desks, and venue relationships handled directly rather than through a dedicated liquidity partner. For institutional buyers of data and execution, the substitute is often fragmentation itself: firms patching together exchange APIs, CSV exports, and internal tooling instead of paying for a unified stack [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [LO:TECH, August 2025].
Edge and durability
MIXED The clearest edge visible in public sources is not brand, it is infrastructure scope.
LO:TECH consistently presents the same argument across fundraising and product materials: one system spanning centralized venues, DeFi, traditional finance, and prediction markets, built for continuously operating markets rather than legacy trading hours [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [The Cryptonomist, November 2026]. If that claim holds in production, the advantage is operational. A client that wants market making, normalized data, and eventually execution services from one provider faces lower integration burden than if it stitched together separate vendors for each layer [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [Tech Funding News, November 2026].
There are two public signals that this edge is more than presentation, though both should be treated cautiously. First, the company says it serves more than 50 clients, including public companies, which suggests some ability to sell beyond crypto-native startups [Tech Funding News, November 2026]. Second, the Kalshi relationship is one of the few product claims corroborated beyond company channels, with public reporting describing LO:TECH as a licensed distributor of that data [europeanbusinessmagazine.com, July 2026] [fow.com, retrieved 2026]. The durability of that edge is mixed. Normalized cross-venue data and execution rails can become sticky once embedded in customer workflows, but pure speed and liquidity quality are perishable advantages in market structure businesses, because rivals can invest, copy, or underprice if the moat is mostly engineering throughput rather than exclusive access.
Exposure and likely pressure points
MIXED The main exposure is that LO:TECH appears to compete in categories where scale, balance sheet depth, and venue-level relationships usually compound toward larger incumbents.
That is most obvious in market making. The public record supports that LO:TECH offers Market Making as a Service and pitches visibility and control to token issuers through a dashboard [LO:TECH, October 2026] [cryptoslate.com, retrieved 2026] [a-teaminsight.com, retrieved 2026]. But the same evidence does not establish exclusive distribution, proprietary venue ownership, or a protected channel to issuers. If a larger liquidity provider can offer tighter spreads, deeper capital commitment, or broader exchange coverage, LO:TECH’s service model could face pressure even if the software layer is well received. The company also does not control the underlying venues it depends on, and venue policy changes can alter economics for any intermediary built on exchange connectivity [LO:TECH, October 2026].
There is a second exposure in customer interpretation. A count of more than 50 clients sounds useful, but public materials do not break out how many buy data only, how many use market making, and how concentrated revenue is by account or product [Tech Funding News, November 2026]. In competitive terms, that leaves open the possibility that the broad platform story is still narrower in commercial reality. The same caution applies to Pyth Pro ranking claims and other performance assertions that remain company- or social-post-based in the supplied sources [lo.tech, retrieved 2024] [x.com/lo_tech, retrieved 2026].
Eighteen-month scenario
MIXED The most plausible 18-month scenario is a sorting of providers into integrated multi-product firms on one side and point solutions on the other.
The winner if integration demand rises is LO:TECH itself. That case depends on institutional clients increasingly wanting one counterparty for token liquidity, normalized data, and execution connectivity across crypto, prediction markets, and parts of traditional finance [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026]. Its November 2026 Series A was explicitly tied to expansion in the United States and Asia-Pacific, including New York and Singapore, which fits that integrated-platform thesis if the company can turn geographic expansion into local client density [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [TokenPost, November 2026].
The loser if venue-native tooling improves is the independent middle layer represented here by LO:TECH. If exchanges, oracle networks, and regulated venues make their own data and liquidity tools easier to consume directly, some buyers may bypass aggregators and service providers in favor of direct connectivity [lo.tech, retrieved 2024]. That would not eliminate the company’s role, but it would narrow the premium it can charge for normalization, routing, and issuer support. On the public evidence available, the competitive outcome turns less on category growth than on whether LO:TECH can make its cross-venue infrastructure sufficiently embedded that switching costs become operational rather than merely contractual.
Inferred, not confirmed -- This section relies on public company materials and a limited set of independent publisher reports. tech, retrieved 2024] [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [TokenPost, November 2026].
Opportunity
Upside case
PUBLIC The prize is large if LO:TECH can turn a trading firm with specialized rails into a default data, liquidity, and execution layer for markets that do not close, especially where crypto, prediction markets, and traditional financial workflows begin to converge [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [LO:TECH, August 2025] [lo.tech].
The headline opportunity is not simply to be another market maker. It is to become a cross-venue operating layer for institutional participants that need one stack for pricing, execution, and market data across centralized exchanges, DeFi venues, prediction markets, and selected traditional finance workflows [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026] [lo.tech]. That outcome is reachable, not merely aspirational, because the public record shows three things already in place: a multi-product footprint spanning proprietary trading, market-data distribution, market making, and execution technology [lo.tech] [LO:TECH, October 2026]; early customer evidence in the form of more than 50 clients, including public companies, according to Tech Funding News [Tech Funding News, November 2026]; and a financing history that indicates outside investors are willing to fund the build-out from crypto-native services toward broader capital-markets infrastructure [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026]. The key here is scope. Few firms claim to sit across liquidity provision, normalized data, and execution in both digital and regulated event markets, and LO:TECH has at least some public evidence for that bridge through its Kalshi data distribution and Pyth Pro pricing presence [European Business Magazine, July 2026] [lo.tech].
The paths to scale are not identical, and the public evidence supports a handful of distinct routes rather than one monolithic outcome.
| Scenario | What happens | Catalyst | Why it's plausible |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-venue institutional rails | LO:TECH becomes a preferred vendor for funds, brokers, and market participants that need one normalized feed and execution layer across crypto and adjacent 24/7 markets | The MMC-led Series A funds US and Asia-Pacific expansion and execution-service growth [Tech Funding News, November 2026] | The company already markets low-latency data across 30+ venues and offers trading plus execution technology, which suggests the product surface is broader than token market making alone [LO:TECH, retrieved 2024] [Tech Funding News, November 2026] |
| Token-liquidity control plane | The MMaaS product becomes a standard operating tool for token issuers that want liquidity, exchange management, and reporting without building in-house market structure teams | Launch of Market Making as a Service and named exchange relationships with Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Gate.io [LO:TECH, October 2026] | LO:TECH publicly positions MMaaS as a dashboard-driven service with reporting and parameter control, which is a more software-like offer than pure principal trading [CryptoSlate] [LO:TECH, October 2026] |
| Regulated event-data beachhead | Kalshi data distribution opens a route into institutions that care about prediction markets as an emerging asset and information class | Becoming a licensed distributor of Kalshi market data [European Business Magazine, July 2026] | The Kalshi relationship gives LO:TECH a public foothold in regulated event-market data, and the company says that feed sits alongside its broader institutional-grade live and historical APIs [European Business Magazine, July 2026] [FOW] |
What compounding looks like here is a service-to-software flywheel. A client may enter through one immediate need, token liquidity, market data, or execution, but the infrastructure underneath appears to be shared, with the company describing proprietary trading infrastructure, normalized data delivery, and a single operating environment for clients [A-Team Insight] [LO:TECH, October 2026] [lo.tech]. If that architecture works as advertised, each added venue and each added dataset makes the next product sale easier: better market coverage improves data usefulness, stronger data can improve pricing and execution quality, and better execution or reporting can raise switching costs for issuers and institutional traders. There is early public evidence that this flywheel may be starting. LO:TECH says it serves more than 50 clients [Tech Funding News, November 2026], has expanded from crypto trading into MMaaS and licensed Kalshi distribution [LO:TECH, October 2026] [European Business Magazine, July 2026], and is hiring for data engineering and HFT trading roles, which is at least directionally consistent with continued platform build-out rather than a narrow advisory model [LO:TECH, retrieved 2024] [freehire.me].
The size of the win is harder to anchor because the available source set does not include a clean public comparable or an external market-size study. Even so, one credible framing is that a company controlling meaningful slices of institutional market data, execution, and liquidity in always-on venues could command infrastructure-style economics rather than pure trading-firm economics if software and data revenue become durable alongside principal activity. In that scenario, if LO:TECH were to emerge as a recognized cross-market infrastructure provider across crypto, prediction markets, and selected traditional workflows, the strategic value could plausibly extend well beyond its current disclosed funding base of about $18.6 million and into the profile of a scaled fintech infrastructure asset (scenario, not a forecast) [LO:TECH, August 2025] [Tech Funding News, November 2026]. The public evidence is not yet strong enough to put a responsible number on that upside, but it is strong enough to say the company is pursuing a category with room for outsize outcomes if its product breadth converts into durable institutional dependence.
Single-source, plausible -- This section relies on one independent news report for client count, multiple company statements for product scope, and partial third-party corroboration for Kalshi distribution and founder roles.
Sources
From the public record
[lo.tech, retrieved 2024] LO:TECH | https://lo.tech/
[Tech Funding News, November 2026] LO:TECH raises $12M from MMC to build a trading firm for 24/7 and onchain markets | https://techfundingnews.com/lotech-12m-series-a-market-making-tokenised-assets/
[LO:TECH, October 2026] LO:TECH Secures $1.6 Million in Seed Funding and Introduces Market Making as a Service for Digital Assets | https://lo.tech/news/lotech-secures-1-6-million-in-seed-funding
[LO:TECH, August 2025] LO:TECH Raises $5M to Accelerate Next Stage of Growth in Onchain Capital Markets | https://lo.tech/news/lo-tech-raises-5m-seed-round
[The Cryptonomist, November 2026] LO:TECH Series A funding brings in $12 million for US, Asia-Pacific expansion | https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2026/11/02/lo-tech-series-a-funding/
[Reuters, December 2015] Fulcrum Asset Management names two new partners | https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/funds/fulcrum-asset-management-names-two-new-partners-idUSL3N1433WL/
[TechCrunch, July 2012] Please Welcome Alex Williams, Greg Ferenstein, Christine Ying And TechCrunch Interns Billy Gallagher And Natalie Swope | https://techcrunch.com/2012/07/03/please-welcome-alex-williams-greg-ferenstein-christine-ying-and-techcrunch-interns-billy-gallagher-and-natalie-swope/
[TechCrunch] Alex Williams, Author at TechCrunch | https://techcrunch.com/author/alex-williams/
[TokenPost, November 2026] LO:TECH Closes $12 Million Series A to Expand in New York and Singapore | https://www.tokenpost.com/news/business/46668
[LO:TECH, retrieved 2024] LO:TECH Careers | https://careers.lo.tech/
[Spotify, retrieved 2026] Will Blockchain Replace Traditional Finance? The Future of Trading Explained | Tim Meggs, CEO and Co-Founder of LO:TECH | https://open.spotify.com/episode/7vFmJdlTLoOFLWNnuuOe39
[Spotify, retrieved 2026] Serving Crypto Markets - Tim Meggs (Lo:Tech) | https://open.spotify.com/episode/60Z7IOB0WbXNbpsDGzWWSg
[Bloomberg, May 2021] The Economy Is Booming. Why Don’t Firms Believe It? | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-24/the-economy-is-booming-why-don-t-firms-believe-it
Articles about LO:TECH
- LO:TECH's $12 Million Series A Funds a 24/7 Trading Firm — The London-based firm, which now serves over 50 clients, is expanding its high-frequency trading and data services into the US and Asia-Pacific.