Buzze

Mobile app and network connecting EV drivers with residential Level 2 chargers and supporting multifamily charging infrastructure.

Website: https://buzze.biz/

Cover Block

Publicly reported

Field	Value
Name	Buzze
Tagline	Mobile app and network connecting EV drivers with residential Level 2 chargers and supporting multifamily charging infrastructure.
Headquarters	Phoenix, United States
Founded	2022
Stage	Seed
Business Model	Marketplace
Industry	Cleantech / Climatetech
Technology	Software (Non-AI)
Geography	North America
Growth Profile	Venture Scale
Founding Team	Co-Founders (3+)
Funding Label	Seed
Total Disclosed Funding	~$4,800,000 [Silicon Oasis, September 2026] [LinkedIn, March 2026] [SuperAGI]

Summary and Signal

PUBLIC Buzze is building a two-sided EV charging network that links drivers, especially renters and multifamily residents, with residential Level 2 chargers through a mobile app, and it merits attention now because the company has moved beyond an early consumer wedge into multifamily infrastructure while continuing to add financing capacity [Buzze] [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [Silicon Oasis, September 2026]. Founded in 2022 in Phoenix, Buzze appears to have started with a simple observation from founder Aaron Lieberman that charging demand clustered near apartments and condominiums, where many EV drivers lacked home charging access, then expanded that thesis into a property-facing deployment model [CB Insights] [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023] [Founders Workshop].

The product is straightforward in concept but more ambitious in scope than a basic listing app: hosts can list underused chargers, drivers can locate and book nearby charging, and Buzze says its app uses the Smartcar API to meter sessions and track relevant charging data [Buzze]. The company now also pitches multifamily owners, developers, and operators on a turnkey charging solution, with public materials asserting that incentives can offset installation costs and that installed chargers join Buzze's broader network, which creates a clearer supply acquisition path than relying only on individual homeowners [Prospeo] [Founders Workshop].

The team is led by Lieberman, a former Arizona state representative and founder-CEO, alongside Jesse Martin, who joined as co-founder and chief product officer before later being listed as president, and Nestor Carrillo, who is identified as co-founder and chief growth officer [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023] [LinkedIn] [Nestor Carrillo LinkedIn]. That background does not yet read like a conventional charging-hardware founding bench, but it does combine public-sector familiarity, product leadership, and go-to-market ownership in ways that fit a business selling into regulated and incentive-heavy multifamily environments [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023] [LinkedIn] [Prospeo].

Funding is modest but increasingly layered. Public sources point to an approximately $1.3 million seed round in 2024, non-dilutive financing from Enduring Planet in 2025, a $1 million credit facility from Prospeq in March 2026, and a $2.5 million seed round plus a $1 million receivables line in September 2026, for roughly $4.8 million in disclosed equity and credit financing excluding the undisclosed 2025 facility [SuperAGI] [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [LinkedIn, March 2026] [Silicon Oasis, September 2026].

The business model also shows useful range. Early public reporting described pay-as-you-go charging at $0.25 per kilowatt-hour with host payouts at $0.20 per kilowatt-hour, while later materials also reference subscription plans of $50 to $149 per month, suggesting Buzze is testing both transaction revenue and recurring access economics as it builds density [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023] [Yahoo Finance].

Over the next 12 to 18 months, the main questions are less about category demand than execution: whether Buzze can translate financing into repeatable multifamily deployments, whether its 10-state installation footprint turns into durable network utilization, and whether the company can show that its marketplace and infrastructure motions reinforce each other rather than fragment focus [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [Silicon Oasis, September 2026]. The public record is encouraging on ambition and capital access, but still thin on customer names, deployment volumes, and revenue proof, so the investment case remains tied to evidence of scaled property onboarding and charger usage rather than narrative alone [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [Koelbel] [Crunchbase].

No independent source found -- This section blends company materials, lender case-study claims, LinkedIn profiles, and one company-data source for early financing; several core product and pricing facts remain company-only or lightly corroborated.

Taxonomy Snapshot

Axis	Value
Stage	Seed
Business Model	Marketplace
Industry / Vertical	Cleantech / Climatetech
Technology Type	Software (Non-AI)
Geography	North America
Growth Profile	Venture Scale
Founding Team	Co-Founders (3+)
Funding	Seed, total disclosed approximately $4.8 million

Company Overview

PUBLIC

Buzze presents a fairly clear origin story in the public record: the company is an Arizona-based EV charging startup built around a mobile app and charging network that connects drivers to residential Level 2 chargers, with a more recent emphasis on multifamily charging infrastructure [Crunchbase] [Buzze]. Public profiles place the company in Phoenix and date its founding to 2022, which matters because it frames Buzze as an early company still defining whether its long-term identity is primarily a consumer marketplace, an infrastructure enabler for property owners, or a blend of both [Crunchbase] [Buzze].

The milestone sequence is visible, if still lightly documented by primary corporate materials. Buzze's website describes the core marketplace model for hosts and drivers, while Crunchbase records the company as seed stage [Buzze] [Crunchbase]. The same public materials indicate that the company began with residential charger sharing and has since expanded its positioning toward multifamily owners, developers, and operators seeking charging deployment and network management, suggesting a broadened go-to-market motion rather than a fully new product line [Buzze].

One source, partially checked -- Confirmed primarily by Crunchbase and the company website, with chronology limited by sparse state-filing detail in the provided sources.

The Product and the Stack

MIXED

Buzze’s product is easiest to understand as a two-sided charging layer built around underused Level 2 chargers, then extended into multifamily infrastructure. Public product materials say drivers can use the mobile app to find and book nearby residential chargers, while hosts can list chargers, manage availability, and earn income from charging sessions [Buzze]. Founders Workshop, which says it helped research, prototype, build, and launch the app, describes the same consumer workflow and ties it to an initial wedge around renters and other drivers without dependable home charging access [Founders Workshop].

The operating detail that matters is metering and session verification. On its public site, Buzze says the app connects to a driver’s vehicle through the Smartcar API and uses that connection to capture location, battery level on arrival, and kilowatt consumption, which supports usage-based charging rather than a flat reservation fee [Buzze]. In local TV coverage, Aaron Lieberman said drivers were charged 25 cents per kilowatt and hosts were paid 20 cents per kilowatt, with some hosts able to earn up to about $400 per month, although those economics should be treated as company-described early operating terms rather than independently audited unit metrics [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023].

The company’s more recent public positioning shifts from peer-to-peer utilization into turnkey multifamily deployment. Buzze is described in company and partner materials as helping multifamily owners, developers, and operators install and manage charging networks, with chargers then added to the Buzze network so drivers can book sessions and properties can participate in charging revenue [Founders Workshop] [Prospeo]. A named example comes from Denver, where Koelbel and Company said Buzze partnered with Koelbel, Xcel, and the City of Denver to install six chargers at Sienna at Sloans Lake Apartments using Xcel’s commercial EV infrastructure rebate program, which is a more concrete proof point for the infrastructure side than the broader consumer-network claims [Koelbel].

No independent source found -- This section relies heavily on company and partner materials, with partial corroboration from FOX 10 Phoenix and Koelbel for pricing and one deployment example.

The Market They Are Entering

PUBLIC The market matters now because apartment residents and other drivers without dedicated home charging remain one of the clearest bottlenecks in EV adoption, and Buzze is positioning itself at that access gap rather than competing head-on for traditional public fast-charging traffic [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023] [Founders Workshop] [Enduring Planet, August 2025].

The public record here is more directional than fully quantified. No named third-party TAM, SAM, or SOM study appears in the captured source set for Buzze’s specific niche, which is a marketplace and infrastructure layer around residential Level 2 charging and multifamily deployments. What is supported is the company’s own stated progression from a consumer app that lets drivers book residential chargers to a multifamily-focused offering for owners, developers, and operators seeking turnkey charging installation and management [Buzze] [Founders Workshop] [Prospeo]. That shift matters because it moves Buzze from a pure peer-to-peer charging use case into the broader multifamily EV infrastructure market, where property-level economics, rebates, and recurring utilization can matter as much as driver acquisition [Prospeo] [Koelbel].

Demand signals in the source base point to two linked tailwinds. First, Buzze founder Aaron Lieberman said the company saw strongest host activity near urban centers and close to apartment buildings and condominiums, which is consistent with a renter charging-access problem rather than a universal driver problem [CB Insights]. Second, both company and partner materials increasingly frame multifamily housing as the commercial wedge, including a Denver deployment with Koelbel and Company, Xcel, and the City of Denver, and financing that Enduring Planet says helped expand charger installations into 10 states [Koelbel] [Enduring Planet, August 2025]. Taken together, the evidence suggests the addressable demand is less about building another public charging network and more about enabling charging where existing residential and multifamily parking assets already sit.

The nearest adjacent markets are multifamily property technology, EV charging infrastructure finance, and public charging subscriptions. Buzze’s pricing disclosures indicate it has at least tested both pay-as-you-go charging at $0.25 per kilowatt-hour and monthly subscription plans ranging from $50 to $149, while also paying hosts $0.20 per kilowatt-hour in the earlier residential model [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023] [Yahoo Finance]. That creates exposure to adjacent categories with different competitive logic: property owners care about capex recovery and tenant amenity value, drivers care about convenience and price relative to public charging, and lenders or infrastructure financiers care about installation velocity and receivables quality [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [LinkedIn, March 2026]. The company’s market, in other words, sits between real estate operations and mobility services rather than cleanly inside one category.

Regulatory and macro forces appear favorable, though the evidence in this file remains mostly company or partner sourced. Prospeo says incentives may cover up to 100 percent of installation costs for multifamily properties, and the Denver project explicitly cites Xcel Energy’s Commercial EV Infrastructure Rebate Program as part of the deployment structure [Prospeo] [Koelbel]. Buzze’s lenders also frame the category in climate and electrification terms, with Enduring Planet attributing 5,000 metric tons of annual avoided CO2 emissions to charger installations supported through the platform [Enduring Planet, August 2025]. The conservative read is that subsidy availability and local utility programs can materially widen the market for multifamily charging, but the degree of demand pull likely varies by state and utility territory.

Cited market signal	Figure	Relevance to market
States with charger installations expanded into	10 states	Indicates geographic breadth beyond a single pilot market [Enduring Planet, August 2025]
Estimated annual CO2 emissions avoided	5,000 metric tons	Suggests climate-finance alignment and potential eligibility for sustainability-oriented capital [Enduring Planet, August 2025]
Driver pay-as-you-go price	$0.25 per kWh	Anchors consumer willingness-to-pay in the residential charging model [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023]
Host payout	$0.20 per kWh	Shows the marketplace spread in the early residential model [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023]

The table is not a market size model, but it does show where the current evidence is strongest: geographic expansion, incentive-backed deployment, and an early pricing structure that attempts to make neighborhood charging work for both sides of the marketplace. What remains missing from the public record is independent third-party sizing for Buzze's specific segment and evidence on how large the multifamily opportunity is within Buzze's served geographies.

Thinly sourced -- This section relies on a mix of company, partner, lender, and local media sources, with no independent third-party market sizing study in the captured evidence.

The Competitive Field

MIXED Buzze is positioned less against a single direct rival than against three established ways EV drivers and property owners already solve the charging problem: public fast-charging networks, private home charging, and multifamily infrastructure vendors that sell directly to landlords and developers.

The first competitive lane is the public-network option, which remains the default for renters and drivers without dedicated parking. Buzze's public materials describe a network of residential Level 2 chargers bookable through a mobile app, with a focus on neighborhoods and multifamily-adjacent use cases rather than highway corridors or destination retail [Buzze] [Founders Workshop]. That places it in a different operating posture from national fast-charging providers, even if they still compete for the same charging sessions at the margin. The practical substitute for many users is not another neighborhood marketplace but a public charger with higher power, stronger brand recognition, and broader station visibility.

The second lane is the property-tech and infrastructure stack serving apartment owners, developers, and operators. Here Buzze's own positioning has shifted toward a turnkey multifamily offering, with Prospeo describing a model that helps install and manage charging networks and routes those chargers into Buzze's booking network [Prospeo]. The Denver deployment with Koelbel, Xcel, and the City of Denver suggests the company is also competing for rebate-enabled multifamily projects, where procurement often turns on permitting, incentive capture, financing, and property-manager workflow rather than app design alone [Koelbel]. In that segment, the incumbent advantage usually sits with vendors that already have installer relationships, utility program fluency, and an enterprise sales process.

The third lane is the informal substitute, which is simply doing nothing now and waiting for building-level charging economics or regulation to force adoption later. That matters because Buzze's pitch depends on turning a latent pain point into an immediate purchase or host-supply decision. The evidence for its edge today is real but narrow: the company appears to bridge both sides of the market, residential hosts and multifamily property owners, while also offering pricing that local media and company materials present as lower-cost than many public alternatives, including pay-as-you-go charging at 25 cents per kilowatt-hour and subscription plans from $50 to $149 per month [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023] [Yahoo Finance]. The Smartcar-based metering layer also matters because it gives the company a cleaner way to track battery level, location on arrival, and energy consumed across a fragmented host network [Buzze].

That edge is useful, but it also looks perishable unless Buzze can thicken supply in dense renter corridors faster than alternatives improve. A marketplace built on underused residential chargers benefits from local density, but it can be copied at the feature level, and the public record does not yet show exclusive hardware, exclusive utility access, or a named anchor-property portfolio that would make the network difficult to replicate [Buzze] [Prospeo]. The stronger defensive element may be execution inside incentive-heavy multifamily deployments, especially if Enduring Planet's financing did in fact help the company expand installations into 10 states, because that suggests some operating capability beyond a simple consumer app [Enduring Planet, August 2025]. Even there, durability depends on repeatable project sourcing and landlord adoption, both of which remain only partially visible from public evidence.

Buzze appears most exposed where charging reliability, charger speed, and enterprise procurement matter more than neighborhood convenience. Public fast-charging networks retain the clearest advantage for drivers who value certainty and time over price, while dedicated multifamily charging vendors should hold the stronger position in large portfolio-wide rollouts because landlords often prefer a single accountable infrastructure provider. Buzze is also exposed to a channel problem: it does not appear, from the cited public materials, to own the automaker interface, the utility customer relationship, or a proprietary hardware layer [Buzze] [Founders Workshop] [Prospeo]. That means its control point sits in software, local supply aggregation, and financing-enabled deployment, which is an attractive wedge but not yet a locked one.

Over the next 18 months, the most plausible competitive outcome is bifurcation by use case rather than a single category winner. Buzze is the likely winner if multifamily owners increasingly want a lighter-capex, incentive-assisted model that can monetize installed chargers through a shared network, particularly in dense renter markets where residential and apartment demand overlap [Prospeo] [Enduring Planet, August 2025]. The likely loser if public charging access improves materially near apartments and mixed-use corridors is the original residential host marketplace concept, because its value rests on scarcity of nearby charging more than on a proprietary customer relationship [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023] [Buzze]. The commercial question is whether Buzze becomes primarily a multifamily deployment company with a network attached, or remains a two-sided neighborhood marketplace that happens to sell into property owners.

Opportunity

Upside Case

PUBLIC The prize here is not another charging app, it is a shot at becoming the demand layer and deployment partner for EV charging where public infrastructure has historically been weakest: apartment buildings, condos, and neighborhood residential settings that sit outside the standard gas-station replacement model [Buzze] [Founders Workshop] [Enduring Planet, August 2025].

The most credible upside case is that Buzze becomes a default operating layer for multifamily EV charging, with a consumer marketplace attached. The public evidence is still early and uneven, but it points in a coherent direction. Buzze began with a consumer wedge, matching drivers to underused residential Level 2 chargers through a mobile app, then appears to have expanded toward multifamily owners, developers, and operators that need installation, management, and monetization support [Buzze] [Founders Workshop] [Prospeo]. That evolution matters because the marketplace problem, charger utilization, driver discovery, host monetization, and property-owner ROI all improve if the same company can influence both network supply and site deployment. The case is not that Buzze has already won this position. It is that the company has shown enough product breadth, financing access, and installation momentum across 10 states to make the outcome reachable rather than purely aspirational [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [Silicon Oasis, September 2026].

The public pathways to scale are easier to see when separated into a few concrete scenarios.

Scenario	What happens	Catalyst	Why it's plausible
Multifamily network standard	Buzze becomes the preferred charging operator for apartment and condo owners that want turnkey installation plus recurring charging revenue	Utility rebates and financing make installs economical for property owners, including cases where incentives may cover up to 100% of installation cost [Prospeo]	The company already positions itself around multifamily charging, and its financing partners explicitly describe expansion of charger installations across 10 states [Prospeo] [Enduring Planet, August 2025]
Residential supply aggregation	Buzze builds the largest bookable network of underused private Level 2 chargers in dense urban neighborhoods	Continued driver demand from renters and multifamily residents without home charging, paired with host income incentives such as 20 cents per kilowatt and up to about $400 per month in the early model [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023]	Founder commentary cited by CB Insights, as captured in the research, says the busiest hosts were near urban centers and close to apartment buildings and condominiums, which fits the supply-demand geometry of the product [CB Insights] [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023]
Embedded financing and deployment platform	Buzze pairs charger deployment with credit products and rebate capture, making it easier for owners and developers to adopt at portfolio scale	Access to non-dilutive financing from Enduring Planet and a $1 million credit facility from Prospeq could support a more repeatable sales motion around deployment [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [LinkedIn, March 2026]	The company has already assembled multiple forms of capital beyond equity, including non-dilutive financing, a receivables line, and a credit facility, which is relevant in an infrastructure-adjacent category where project timing matters [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [Silicon Oasis, September 2026] [LinkedIn, March 2026]

The compounding logic is straightforward if the model works at site level. Each installed charger adds supply to the network, each additional driver improves utilization for hosts and property owners, and each higher-utilization site makes the next installation easier to justify. Public materials also suggest a feedback loop at the product layer: Buzze says its app uses the Smartcar API to track location, battery level on arrival, and kilowatts consumed, which in theory lets the company improve booking reliability, charging measurement, and host payouts over time [Buzze]. On the deployment side, Buzze's partnership with Koelbel and Company, Xcel, and the City of Denver at Sienna at Sloans Lake Apartments shows the company can participate in a stack that combines real estate ownership, municipal coordination, and utility rebate programs [Koelbel]. If repeated, that sort of configuration can create local credibility and lower customer-acquisition friction in adjacent properties.

The upper bound is large enough to matter, even without a clean public market-size figure in the source set. EV charging has already produced meaningful venture outcomes, but Buzze's more relevant benchmark is not a pure hardware seller, it is a software-plus-network operator that controls driver access, site economics, and deployment workflow. As a rough directional frame, if Buzze were to become a meaningful regional or national multifamily charging platform with thousands of active sites, recurring software and transaction revenue, and durable financing relationships, the company could plausibly support a venture-scale outcome in the hundreds of millions of dollars in enterprise value (scenario, not a forecast). That framing rests on the evidence that Buzze has moved beyond a single-city app concept into multi-state installations, has raised follow-on capital across equity and credit, and is operating in a part of the EV transition where the pain point, renters without reliable charging access, is specific enough to support focused execution [Enduring Planet, August 2025] [Silicon Oasis, September 2026] [FOX 10 Phoenix, November 2023].

One source, partially checked -- This section relies on a mix of company materials, a local news report, and financing announcements, with partial corroboration from Enduring Planet and Silicon Oasis for expansion and funding claims.

Sources